Republican lawmakers on Sunday grappled with the potential need to protect special counsel in light of a report that said called for his firing last year.
Hosts on the Sunday shows questioned lawmakers about the revelations in The New York Timesand what they mean for the investigation into Russia’s election interference and any potential ties between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.
Sen. (R-Maine), a key Republican who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is conducting its own Russia probe, said it “wouldn’t hurt” to pass legislation protecting Mueller.
“It certainly wouldn’t hurt to put that extra safeguard in place given the latest stories,” she told CNN’s “State of the Union.”
Collins also noted that only Deputy Attorney General , who appointed Mueller last year after the firing of former FBI Director , could fire the special counsel.
Sen. (R-S.C.), who last year proposed legislation protecting Mueller, said the special counsel should “look at” the Times’s report.
“I don’t know if the story is true or not, but I know this: Mueller should look at it,” he
Graham, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is conducting its own Russia probe, also said firing Mueller would end Trump’s tenure.
“I don’t know what happened last year, but it’s pretty clear to me that everybody in the White House knows it would be the end of President Trump’s presidency if he fired Mr. Mueller,” he told ABC.
Some Republicans have criticized the special counsel’s probe over anti-Trump text messages exchanged between an FBI agent and a bureau lawyer who were formerly part of the investigation, arguing the messages reveal an anti-Trump bias within the bureau.
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman(R-S.C.) said Sunday he has confidence in the special counsel and that Mueller’s critics should “leave him the hell alone.”
“Mueller didn’t raise his hand and say ‘pick me,’ ” Gowdy“We as a country asked him to do this.”
But one Republican was unwilling to commit to legislation enshrining protections for Mueller. House Majority Leader (R-Calif.) said he doesn’t believe a bill shielding Mueller is necessary “right now.”
“If there’s an issue that arise[s], we’ll take it up at that time,” McCarthy told NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “But right now, there is not an issue, so why create one when there isn’t a place for it?”
Democrats, meanwhile, were reinvigorated by last week’s report in the Times, which said Trump called for Mueller’s firing, but backtracked when White House counsel Don McGahn threatened to quit.
The revelation provided fodder for Democrats, some of whom have argued the president obstructed justice in the course of the Russia investigation.
But not all Democrats are committed to labeling Trump’s reported call to fire Mueller, or any of his other moves, as obstruction of justice.
Sen. (D-W.Va.), another member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, refused to join Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) in declaring that there is an obstruction of justice case against Trump.
“I haven’t gone down that road, nor am I going to go down that road. I believe in the rule of law and it pertains to all of us,” the West Virginia Democrat told CNN’s “State of the Union.”
“We’re all treated the same. And if any of this has happened it will come out.”
Manchin, who is up for reelection this year in a state Trump won by more than 40 points, said it’s “premature” for Democrats to place provisions safeguarding Mueller in the upcoming budget negotiations.
“I think it’s premature for us to go down that road, too. There’s a process they have to go through,” Manchin told Jake Tapper.
“Mr. Rosenstein would be the first person that I would think — if there’s going to be some movement in that direction — where they’re going to go first. And I think that would give us time to move and act if we need to. I hope it doesn’t come to that. I really do. But we have to wait and see.”
Lawmakers in the upper chamber last year introduced (D-N.J.) would stipulate that a judge must approve a request from the Justice Department to fire Mueller, or any special counsel. Another bill, proposed by Sen. (R-N.C.) and Sen. (D-Del.), would allow Mueller or any other special counsel to challenge a firing in court.aimed at protecting Mueller. A bill from Graham and Sen.
White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short on Sunday said he had no knowledge of the president ever suggesting he wanted Mueller fired.
“I’m not aware the president ever intimated he wanted to fire Robert Mueller,” Short told “Fox News Sunday.”
“Robert Mueller is still the special counsel, Don McGahn is still head of White House counsel, the White House continues to cooperate in every manner, providing every document the special counsel has asked for.”
Trump also dismissed the report that he once called for Mueller’s firing as “fake news.”
“Fake news. Fake news. Typical New York Times. Fake stories,” the president told reporters in Davos, Switzerland last week.